<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300780</link>
    <description>The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Section 132 CGST Act, 2017 was dismissed by the court. The judge found that based on the seriousness of the alleged offence and ongoing investigation, it was not a suitable case to grant bail. The petitioner&#039;s argument of being falsely implicated and the nature of the offence being triable by a Magistrate were considered, but ultimately, the bail application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300780</link>
      <description>The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Section 132 CGST Act, 2017 was dismissed by the court. The judge found that based on the seriousness of the alleged offence and ongoing investigation, it was not a suitable case to grant bail. The petitioner&#039;s argument of being falsely implicated and the nature of the offence being triable by a Magistrate were considered, but ultimately, the bail application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>