<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300773</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Securitisation Act does not override the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. It held that tenants inducted before the creation of security interest cannot be summarily evicted under the Securitisation Act, preserving their rights under the Rent Control Act. The court allowed the petitioners to file an application under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act within a month, ensuring their rights were protected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300773</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Securitisation Act does not override the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. It held that tenants inducted before the creation of security interest cannot be summarily evicted under the Securitisation Act, preserving their rights under the Rent Control Act. The court allowed the petitioners to file an application under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act within a month, ensuring their rights were protected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>