https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300772 The court upheld the PF Tribunal's decision, ruling that the auction purchaser was not liable for damages and interest under the PF Act for the erstwhile establishment's defaults. It clarified that Section 17B of the PF Act does not apply to enforced auction sales. The court found the PF Organization's demand from the auction purchaser to be arbitrary and lacking legal basis. Despite objections to the petition's maintainability, the court addressed the case's merits and dismissed the petition, affirming the PF Tribunal's decision. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:13:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300772 The court upheld the PF Tribunal's decision, ruling that the auction purchaser was not liable for damages and interest under the PF Act for the erstwhile establishment's defaults. It clarified that Section 17B of the PF Act does not apply to enforced auction sales. The court found the PF Organization's demand from the auction purchaser to be arbitrary and lacking legal basis. Despite objections to the petition's maintainability, the court addressed the case's merits and dismissed the petition, affirming the PF Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300772