https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300770 In an alleged Central Excise duty evasion matter, the HC treated the accusation as an economic offence requiring serious scrutiny at the bail stage under section 439 CrPC. It nevertheless noted that the principal disputed excise demand had already been deposited and received by the department before the decision. Without examining the merits of the allegations, the Court held that this circumstance justified enlargement on bail, and the bail application was allowed. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:04:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300770 In an alleged Central Excise duty evasion matter, the HC treated the accusation as an economic offence requiring serious scrutiny at the bail stage under section 439 CrPC. It nevertheless noted that the principal disputed excise demand had already been deposited and received by the department before the decision. Without examining the merits of the allegations, the Court held that this circumstance justified enlargement on bail, and the bail application was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300770