https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300761 A sale conducted by a statutory corporation in recovery proceedings was not treated as a voluntary transfer by the former employer, so the purchaser was not saddled with liability for the previous occupier's dues under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The existence of an alternative remedy under Section 75 did not bar writ relief, because writ jurisdiction is not excluded merely by the availability of a statutory forum and the dispute had already remained unresolved for years on a settled legal issue. The impugned attachment was therefore quashed and full writ relief granted. en-us Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:42:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300761 A sale conducted by a statutory corporation in recovery proceedings was not treated as a voluntary transfer by the former employer, so the purchaser was not saddled with liability for the previous occupier's dues under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The existence of an alternative remedy under Section 75 did not bar writ relief, because writ jurisdiction is not excluded merely by the availability of a statutory forum and the dispute had already remained unresolved for years on a settled legal issue. The impugned attachment was therefore quashed and full writ relief granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300761