<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300760</link>
    <description>The court held that the transferee, a new establishment with no connection to the previous unit, was not liable for provident fund dues under Section 17-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were quashed. The Provident Fund Commissioner could recover the dues from the liquidator or the original concern, M/s Goindwal Cooperative Spinning Mills Limited, in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300760</link>
      <description>The court held that the transferee, a new establishment with no connection to the previous unit, was not liable for provident fund dues under Section 17-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were quashed. The Provident Fund Commissioner could recover the dues from the liquidator or the original concern, M/s Goindwal Cooperative Spinning Mills Limited, in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>