<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1010 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300759</link>
    <description>The amended definition of &quot;operator&quot; in the Bombay Motor Vehicles (Taxation of Passengers) Act, 1958 was held to apply only to the limited class of cases expressly covered by the amendment, namely where a stage carriage was used without a permit. A wider reading that would treat mere possession or control as sufficient in every situation was rejected. On that construction, the financer who had resumed possession of vehicles under hire purchase agreements could not be fastened with passenger tax arrears or the consequential penalty. The High Court&#039;s view in favour of the financer was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:04:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1010 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300759</link>
      <description>The amended definition of &quot;operator&quot; in the Bombay Motor Vehicles (Taxation of Passengers) Act, 1958 was held to apply only to the limited class of cases expressly covered by the amendment, namely where a stage carriage was used without a permit. A wider reading that would treat mere possession or control as sufficient in every situation was rejected. On that construction, the financer who had resumed possession of vehicles under hire purchase agreements could not be fastened with passenger tax arrears or the consequential penalty. The High Court&#039;s view in favour of the financer was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>