https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300758 A company may file a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint through a representative who asserts authority to act for it. Where the accused disputes that authority, the issue is one for proof at trial, not a ground for rejecting the complaint at presentation. The absence of a certified board resolution, by itself, does not justify threshold dismissal if authorisation is claimed and can be tested by evidence. On that basis, the complaint was held fit to proceed to trial in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:58:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300758 A company may file a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint through a representative who asserts authority to act for it. Where the accused disputes that authority, the issue is one for proof at trial, not a ground for rejecting the complaint at presentation. The absence of a certified board resolution, by itself, does not justify threshold dismissal if authorisation is claimed and can be tested by evidence. On that basis, the complaint was held fit to proceed to trial in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300758