<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 958 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300754</link>
    <description>Supply of explosives by an assessee to contractors for use in mining operations was treated as a taxable sale under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 because property in the goods passed for consideration, including in the course of execution of the works arrangement. The fact that the explosives were consumed in the work, or that resale was restricted under the licence, did not alter the statutory character of the transfer. The assessee could not rely on concessional procurement declarations to avoid differential tax, as the goods were transferred to contractors rather than used by the assessee itself in the manner required. Interest was also held recoverable on the unpaid tax shortfall from the prescribed default date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 958 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300754</link>
      <description>Supply of explosives by an assessee to contractors for use in mining operations was treated as a taxable sale under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 because property in the goods passed for consideration, including in the course of execution of the works arrangement. The fact that the explosives were consumed in the work, or that resale was restricted under the licence, did not alter the statutory character of the transfer. The assessee could not rely on concessional procurement declarations to avoid differential tax, as the goods were transferred to contractors rather than used by the assessee itself in the manner required. Interest was also held recoverable on the unpaid tax shortfall from the prescribed default date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>