<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1003 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418752</link>
    <description>A dispute arose over whether Section 161 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 could be used to act on an apparent mismatch between a driver&#039;s vehicle documents and GST portal records, or whether the proper remedy was an appeal under Section 107. The Court noted both sides&#039; positions, sought a short affidavit explaining why Section 161 could not be invoked on the stated facts, and directed the matter to be listed again. No final determination was made on the statutory question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1003 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418752</link>
      <description>A dispute arose over whether Section 161 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 could be used to act on an apparent mismatch between a driver&#039;s vehicle documents and GST portal records, or whether the proper remedy was an appeal under Section 107. The Court noted both sides&#039; positions, sought a short affidavit explaining why Section 161 could not be invoked on the stated facts, and directed the matter to be listed again. No final determination was made on the statutory question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>