<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418749</link>
    <description>In ongoing GST investigations, summons issued under Section 70 generally will not be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC, and courts will not interfere at the preliminary stage unless exceptional circumstances and a credible apprehension of abuse are shown. The Delhi HC held that disputed factual defences and territorial jurisdiction objections were matters for investigation, not for summary adjudication, and found no basis to treat the proceedings as lacking jurisdiction. It also declined to order videography or the visible presence of counsel during examination, holding that such safeguards are not available as a matter of right absent special grounds. The petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418749</link>
      <description>In ongoing GST investigations, summons issued under Section 70 generally will not be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC, and courts will not interfere at the preliminary stage unless exceptional circumstances and a credible apprehension of abuse are shown. The Delhi HC held that disputed factual defences and territorial jurisdiction objections were matters for investigation, not for summary adjudication, and found no basis to treat the proceedings as lacking jurisdiction. It also declined to order videography or the visible presence of counsel during examination, holding that such safeguards are not available as a matter of right absent special grounds. The petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>