https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418748 The HC quashed tax refund rejection orders for violating natural justice principles. The petitioner's ITC refund claims were rejected without proper notice, opportunity to respond, or reasons for inadmissible portions. Despite respondent's objection regarding delay in filing writ petition, the court held that when statutory mandates under Rule 92 requiring 15-day notice before rejection are blatantly violated, such cases remain entertainable under Article 226. The two-year delay was not considered excessive given the procedural violations. The rejection orders were set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements and natural justice. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418748 The HC quashed tax refund rejection orders for violating natural justice principles. The petitioner's ITC refund claims were rejected without proper notice, opportunity to respond, or reasons for inadmissible portions. Despite respondent's objection regarding delay in filing writ petition, the court held that when statutory mandates under Rule 92 requiring 15-day notice before rejection are blatantly violated, such cases remain entertainable under Article 226. The two-year delay was not considered excessive given the procedural violations. The rejection orders were set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements and natural justice. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418748