<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28102</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the AAC&#039;s jurisdiction to direct fresh enquiries and the ITO&#039;s authority to conduct a fresh assessment within the prescribed timeline following a remand order. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal provisions and precedents, emphasizing procedural aspects and timelines under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28102</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the AAC&#039;s jurisdiction to direct fresh enquiries and the ITO&#039;s authority to conduct a fresh assessment within the prescribed timeline following a remand order. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal provisions and precedents, emphasizing procedural aspects and timelines under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>