<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 983 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to rectify the mistake in the revised return of income under Sec. 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the error in the revised return, where an additional zero was added, to be apparent and supported the assessee&#039;s claim that the revised income figure was erroneously stated. Despite discrepancies in income figures, the tax liability remained consistent, leading to the conclusion that rectification was necessary. The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the rectification application, quashed the CIT (Appeals) decision, and favored the assessee in the overall outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 983 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to rectify the mistake in the revised return of income under Sec. 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the error in the revised return, where an additional zero was added, to be apparent and supported the assessee&#039;s claim that the revised income figure was erroneously stated. Despite discrepancies in income figures, the tax liability remained consistent, leading to the conclusion that rectification was necessary. The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the rectification application, quashed the CIT (Appeals) decision, and favored the assessee in the overall outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>