<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 982 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in a case concerning the determination of capital gain tax liability on the sale of land initially treated as agricultural land. Despite the land being sold to an industrial company and used for non-agricultural purposes, the Tribunal considered the agricultural nature of the land at the time of purchase and the legal precedents supporting the exemption of profits from the sale of agricultural land under specific circumstances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 982 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in a case concerning the determination of capital gain tax liability on the sale of land initially treated as agricultural land. Despite the land being sold to an industrial company and used for non-agricultural purposes, the Tribunal considered the agricultural nature of the land at the time of purchase and the legal precedents supporting the exemption of profits from the sale of agricultural land under specific circumstances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>