<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Allowed Deduction for Expenses to Clear Property Title u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62090</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 48(i) - expenditure incurred wholly and exclusive in connection with the transfer of Long Term Capital Asset - In the facts of the present case, undisputedly, the payment made by the assessee is certainly for removing encumbrance and perfecting the title over the property sold. Otherwise, the transaction would have failed. - Claim u/s 48(i) allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Allowed Deduction for Expenses to Clear Property Title u/s 48(i) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62090</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 48(i) - expenditure incurred wholly and exclusive in connection with the transfer of Long Term Capital Asset - In the facts of the present case, undisputedly, the payment made by the assessee is certainly for removing encumbrance and perfecting the title over the property sold. Otherwise, the transaction would have failed. - Claim u/s 48(i) allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>