<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 972 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the individual assessee, overturning the additions of Rs. 3 lakhs from a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and Rs. 5 lakhs from the assessee&#039;s brother under section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately substantiated the transactions, highlighting the failure of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) to consider the HUF&#039;s past savings and income. As a result, the additions were deleted, emphasizing the importance of assessing the source of funds in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:28:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 972 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the individual assessee, overturning the additions of Rs. 3 lakhs from a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and Rs. 5 lakhs from the assessee&#039;s brother under section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately substantiated the transactions, highlighting the failure of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) to consider the HUF&#039;s past savings and income. As a result, the additions were deleted, emphasizing the importance of assessing the source of funds in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>