<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 968 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418717</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the show cause notices and subsequent demands confirmed by the original orders. It held that DRI officers lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notices and that the proceedings were without any authority of law. The Court also granted consequential relief by way of refund or release of seized goods, if any. No order as to costs was made, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 968 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418717</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the show cause notices and subsequent demands confirmed by the original orders. It held that DRI officers lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notices and that the proceedings were without any authority of law. The Court also granted consequential relief by way of refund or release of seized goods, if any. No order as to costs was made, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>