<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 964 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor &#039;M/s. Paramex Transformers Limited&#039; under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, as the Committee of Creditors (COC) unanimously voted for liquidation due to the defunct status of the company since 2014. Mr. Sumit Shukla was appointed as the Liquidator, with instructions to proceed with the liquidation process according to the IBC and relevant regulations. The non-cooperation and failure of the suspended directors to submit a viable One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal led to the decision for liquidation despite the expired Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 964 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor &#039;M/s. Paramex Transformers Limited&#039; under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, as the Committee of Creditors (COC) unanimously voted for liquidation due to the defunct status of the company since 2014. Mr. Sumit Shukla was appointed as the Liquidator, with instructions to proceed with the liquidation process according to the IBC and relevant regulations. The non-cooperation and failure of the suspended directors to submit a viable One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal led to the decision for liquidation despite the expired Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>