<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant against the demand of Service Tax on &#039;Construction of Commercial Complex Services&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized that the demand must be raised under the category of Works Contract Service, as settled by legal precedent. Therefore, the impugned order confirming the demand was set aside, granting relief to the Appellant in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant against the demand of Service Tax on &#039;Construction of Commercial Complex Services&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized that the demand must be raised under the category of Works Contract Service, as settled by legal precedent. Therefore, the impugned order confirming the demand was set aside, granting relief to the Appellant in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>