<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418705</link>
    <description>Charges collected by a statutory public authority for roads, water supply, street lighting, drainage, maintenance and allied amenities in industrial estates were treated as consideration for compulsory statutory functions, not taxable service. The tribunal noted that the corporation&#039;s governing legislation required it to establish and manage industrial estates and provide civic amenities, and that the amounts were collected as a compulsory levy to discharge those obligations. Relying on the corporation&#039;s earlier binding case, it held that activities performed as statutory obligations do not amount to taxable services. The service tax demand and related penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418705</link>
      <description>Charges collected by a statutory public authority for roads, water supply, street lighting, drainage, maintenance and allied amenities in industrial estates were treated as consideration for compulsory statutory functions, not taxable service. The tribunal noted that the corporation&#039;s governing legislation required it to establish and manage industrial estates and provide civic amenities, and that the amounts were collected as a compulsory levy to discharge those obligations. Relying on the corporation&#039;s earlier binding case, it held that activities performed as statutory obligations do not amount to taxable services. The service tax demand and related penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>