https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300753 In a PMLA prosecution, the HC held that the amendment substituting the words "under this Act" in Section 45(1) did not revive the twin conditions for bail that had earlier been declared unconstitutional under Articles 14 and 21. On the facts, the petitioner had undergone custodial interrogation, cooperated with investigation, and no concrete material showed a risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted, subject to conditions. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:24:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300753 In a PMLA prosecution, the HC held that the amendment substituting the words "under this Act" in Section 45(1) did not revive the twin conditions for bail that had earlier been declared unconstitutional under Articles 14 and 21. On the facts, the petitioner had undergone custodial interrogation, cooperated with investigation, and no concrete material showed a risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted, subject to conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300753