<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 949 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418698</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the twin conditions in Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, previously declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, were revived by the legislative amendment of 2018. The amendment rectified the defects identified by the Court, reinstating the twin conditions for bail under the Act. The court highlighted that the legislative amendment is considered constitutional unless invalidated by the judiciary, directing the bail application for further review by the appropriate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 949 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418698</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the twin conditions in Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, previously declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, were revived by the legislative amendment of 2018. The amendment rectified the defects identified by the Court, reinstating the twin conditions for bail under the Act. The court highlighted that the legislative amendment is considered constitutional unless invalidated by the judiciary, directing the bail application for further review by the appropriate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>