<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1344 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, DIVISION BENCH - II, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300747</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) filed by M/s. Mando Automotive India Private Limited against M/s. Chennai Clamptech Designer Private Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code 2016. The Operational Creditor failed to qualify as an Operational Creditor under IBC, 2016 due to a mutual supply arrangement with the Corporate Debtor, which involved conversion of materials rather than a straightforward operational debt relationship. Additionally, essential documents were missing from the application, leading to its dismissal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1344 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, DIVISION BENCH - II, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300747</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) filed by M/s. Mando Automotive India Private Limited against M/s. Chennai Clamptech Designer Private Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code 2016. The Operational Creditor failed to qualify as an Operational Creditor under IBC, 2016 due to a mutual supply arrangement with the Corporate Debtor, which involved conversion of materials rather than a straightforward operational debt relationship. Additionally, essential documents were missing from the application, leading to its dismissal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>