https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300745 The court allowed the petitioner to challenge summons from multiple intelligence agencies simultaneously for alleged GST Act violations. The court upheld the petitioner's right to challenge the summons, dismissing the argument of lack of territorial jurisdiction. The respondent was directed to file a reply affidavit, and the petitioner could participate in proceedings without facing coercive action until the next hearing. The judgment emphasized clarity, legality, and jurisdiction in such matters, ensuring the petitioner's fair participation and legal recourse in the investigation process. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300745 The court allowed the petitioner to challenge summons from multiple intelligence agencies simultaneously for alleged GST Act violations. The court upheld the petitioner's right to challenge the summons, dismissing the argument of lack of territorial jurisdiction. The respondent was directed to file a reply affidavit, and the petitioner could participate in proceedings without facing coercive action until the next hearing. The judgment emphasized clarity, legality, and jurisdiction in such matters, ensuring the petitioner's fair participation and legal recourse in the investigation process. Case-Laws GST Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300745