<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 25 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28095</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amount paid by the assessee for acquiring technical know-how constituted revenue expenditure and was deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act. The court determined that the technical know-how did not create an asset of enduring nature and was essential for the profit-making process, thus qualifying as revenue expenditure. The decision favored the assessee, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 25 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28095</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amount paid by the assessee for acquiring technical know-how constituted revenue expenditure and was deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act. The court determined that the technical know-how did not create an asset of enduring nature and was essential for the profit-making process, thus qualifying as revenue expenditure. The decision favored the assessee, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>