https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418694 The HC declined to entertain a writ application challenging a GST confiscation notice (Form GST MOV 10), noting that a statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 was available. Despite court instructions to halt proceedings, authorities had already passed a final confiscation order (Form MOV 11). The HC disposed of the application without expressing opinion on merits, directing the Appellate Authority to expedite any appeal filed by the applicant and decide within 15 days of registration. The applicant retained liberty to challenge the confiscation order through proper appellate channels, where they could raise the ex-parte nature of the proceedings as a ground. en-us Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418694 The HC declined to entertain a writ application challenging a GST confiscation notice (Form GST MOV 10), noting that a statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 was available. Despite court instructions to halt proceedings, authorities had already passed a final confiscation order (Form MOV 11). The HC disposed of the application without expressing opinion on merits, directing the Appellate Authority to expedite any appeal filed by the applicant and decide within 15 days of registration. The applicant retained liberty to challenge the confiscation order through proper appellate channels, where they could raise the ex-parte nature of the proceedings as a ground. Case-Laws GST Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418694