<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 938 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418687</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision in a case involving violations of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the lease agreement was arm&#039;s length, reimbursements were legitimate, and donations to ISKCON were for charitable purposes. The ITAT criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s divergent view as unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 938 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418687</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision in a case involving violations of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the lease agreement was arm&#039;s length, reimbursements were legitimate, and donations to ISKCON were for charitable purposes. The ITAT criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s divergent view as unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>