https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418684 In second appeal, the Supreme Court noted that concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by a fresh reappraisal of evidence unless a substantial question of law arises; the High Court therefore exceeded its jurisdiction by reversing factual findings. It also clarified that a sale deed executed by a power of attorney holder is not invalid merely because the original power of attorney was not produced, since the registration framework required a true copy of the document presented, not the original authority itself. Alleged cancellation of the authority did not defeat the sale because revocation was not shown to have been effectively communicated, and termination of agency does not bind third parties without notice. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418684 In second appeal, the Supreme Court noted that concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by a fresh reappraisal of evidence unless a substantial question of law arises; the High Court therefore exceeded its jurisdiction by reversing factual findings. It also clarified that a sale deed executed by a power of attorney holder is not invalid merely because the original power of attorney was not produced, since the registration framework required a true copy of the document presented, not the original authority itself. Alleged cancellation of the authority did not defeat the sale because revocation was not shown to have been effectively communicated, and termination of agency does not bind third parties without notice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418684