<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 899 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418648</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order confirming a demand raised by Respondent No.2. The Court quashed the impugned order, directing a fresh consideration of the matter without expressing views on merits. It ordered expeditious disposal by Respondent No.2, with liberty for the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings if needed. All questions of fact and law were to be kept open. The judgment ensured a fair outcome, making the rule absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 899 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418648</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order confirming a demand raised by Respondent No.2. The Court quashed the impugned order, directing a fresh consideration of the matter without expressing views on merits. It ordered expeditious disposal by Respondent No.2, with liberty for the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings if needed. All questions of fact and law were to be kept open. The judgment ensured a fair outcome, making the rule absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>