<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 892 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418641</link>
    <description>Recovery provisions under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, including the first-charge and arrears-of-land-revenue mechanisms, operate only against the dealer or other person legally liable for the tax, interest or penalty. The special mode of recovery functions like a garnishee process and does not authorise attachment of property belonging to a family member unless statutory conditions are met. As the dealer is a distinct taxable entity, the department could proceed only against the dealer&#039;s own property or other property legally liable for the dues. The charge over the father&#039;s agricultural land was without jurisdiction and liable to be cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 892 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418641</link>
      <description>Recovery provisions under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, including the first-charge and arrears-of-land-revenue mechanisms, operate only against the dealer or other person legally liable for the tax, interest or penalty. The special mode of recovery functions like a garnishee process and does not authorise attachment of property belonging to a family member unless statutory conditions are met. As the dealer is a distinct taxable entity, the department could proceed only against the dealer&#039;s own property or other property legally liable for the dues. The charge over the father&#039;s agricultural land was without jurisdiction and liable to be cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>