https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300731 The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition challenging an assessment order for the assessment year 2002-2003 due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the notice of proposal or seek an extension of time. The court ruled that since the petitioner did not address the factual aspects in the reply to the notice of proposal, they cannot raise those points in the writ petition. The petitioner was advised to approach the Appellate Authority to address the factual aspects. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal within two weeks and emphasized that the appeal would be considered on its merits without being bound by the period of limitation. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300731 The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition challenging an assessment order for the assessment year 2002-2003 due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the notice of proposal or seek an extension of time. The court ruled that since the petitioner did not address the factual aspects in the reply to the notice of proposal, they cannot raise those points in the writ petition. The petitioner was advised to approach the Appellate Authority to address the factual aspects. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal within two weeks and emphasized that the appeal would be considered on its merits without being bound by the period of limitation. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300731