https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300718 The Rent Controller, acting under the rent control framework, had no jurisdiction to decide the constitutional validity of the provisions that continued pending standard rent proceedings under the repealing statute. By the same principle, the appellate court and the High Court in revision could not examine that ultra vires challenge for the first time in proceedings arising from the rent fixation orders. The constitutional objection was therefore not entertainable in those proceedings, and the standard rent determined under the earlier Act remained undisturbed on that ground. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300718 The Rent Controller, acting under the rent control framework, had no jurisdiction to decide the constitutional validity of the provisions that continued pending standard rent proceedings under the repealing statute. By the same principle, the appellate court and the High Court in revision could not examine that ultra vires challenge for the first time in proceedings arising from the rent fixation orders. The constitutional objection was therefore not entertainable in those proceedings, and the standard rent determined under the earlier Act remained undisturbed on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300718