<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 12 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28081</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the default period to one month under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the genuine belief held by the assessee regarding the validity of the filed return. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering past practices and circumstances in interpreting tax penalty provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 12 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28081</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the default period to one month under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the genuine belief held by the assessee regarding the validity of the filed return. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering past practices and circumstances in interpreting tax penalty provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>