<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28080</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the constitutional validity of Sections 67 and 182 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the taxation of both the registered firm and its partners did not amount to double taxation. The court also deemed the differentiation between registered firms and other entities as permissible under Article 14 of the Constitution, concluding that the legislative policy allows for such taxation practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28080</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the constitutional validity of Sections 67 and 182 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the taxation of both the registered firm and its partners did not amount to double taxation. The court also deemed the differentiation between registered firms and other entities as permissible under Article 14 of the Constitution, concluding that the legislative policy allows for such taxation practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>