<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 865 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous petition, ruling that there was no mistake apparent on the record in its previous order. The Tribunal held that the failure to issue a separate speaking order for objections did not invalidate the assessment order. It distinguished the case from Deepak Extrusions, emphasizing the limited scope of rectification under Section 254(2) and rejecting the plea for re-argument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 865 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous petition, ruling that there was no mistake apparent on the record in its previous order. The Tribunal held that the failure to issue a separate speaking order for objections did not invalidate the assessment order. It distinguished the case from Deepak Extrusions, emphasizing the limited scope of rectification under Section 254(2) and rejecting the plea for re-argument.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>