<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 853 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418602</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in filing a tax revision will not be excused unless the applicant shows sufficient cause through a credible and diligent explanation. A claimed mistaken belief about the limitation period was rejected because the record showed earlier belated appeals, dismissal for non-deposit after opportunities, and long inactivity before the revision was filed. The court treated the limitation under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 as clear and found that the revision was lodged only after notice of provisional freezing of accounts. Delay was therefore not condoned, the application was rejected, and the connected revision also stood disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 853 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418602</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in filing a tax revision will not be excused unless the applicant shows sufficient cause through a credible and diligent explanation. A claimed mistaken belief about the limitation period was rejected because the record showed earlier belated appeals, dismissal for non-deposit after opportunities, and long inactivity before the revision was filed. The court treated the limitation under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 as clear and found that the revision was lodged only after notice of provisional freezing of accounts. Delay was therefore not condoned, the application was rejected, and the connected revision also stood disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>