https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418600 The court dismissed the revisional application challenging liability under Sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It allowed the proceedings to continue against the petitioner, emphasizing that he could present his defense during the trial to prove lack of involvement or due diligence. The court noted the petitioner's resignation but raised questions about his continued role post-resignation, indicating the need for further evaluation during trial. The court highlighted that each case must be assessed based on its unique facts, leading to the decision to dismiss the challenge and proceed with the case. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2022 10:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418600 The court dismissed the revisional application challenging liability under Sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It allowed the proceedings to continue against the petitioner, emphasizing that he could present his defense during the trial to prove lack of involvement or due diligence. The court noted the petitioner's resignation but raised questions about his continued role post-resignation, indicating the need for further evaluation during trial. The court highlighted that each case must be assessed based on its unique facts, leading to the decision to dismiss the challenge and proceed with the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418600