<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 836 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to an alleged default in settling a significant amount. The Tribunal confirmed the existence of financial debt and default, disregarding disputes between parties once these elements were established. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s name being struck off from the Register of Companies, the Tribunal ruled the petition maintainable. The contention of a third party&#039;s involvement in debt repayment was dismissed due to lack of evidence. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and a moratorium was declared, prohibiting certain actions against the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 836 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to an alleged default in settling a significant amount. The Tribunal confirmed the existence of financial debt and default, disregarding disputes between parties once these elements were established. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s name being struck off from the Register of Companies, the Tribunal ruled the petition maintainable. The contention of a third party&#039;s involvement in debt repayment was dismissed due to lack of evidence. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and a moratorium was declared, prohibiting certain actions against the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>