<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300709</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in interpreting Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, ruling that Assessing Officers can&#039;t make additions without incriminating documents. Long Term Capital Gains were upheld as per existing legal framework, aligning with previous judicial rulings. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing consistency with established precedents and no substantial legal issues arising from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2022 21:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300709</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in interpreting Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, ruling that Assessing Officers can&#039;t make additions without incriminating documents. Long Term Capital Gains were upheld as per existing legal framework, aligning with previous judicial rulings. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing consistency with established precedents and no substantial legal issues arising from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>