<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 11 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28073</link>
    <description>For limitation under Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the relevant date for exclusion under Explanation 1(iv) is the date the Income-tax Officer receives the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s directions under Section 144B, not the date those directions are issued. Applying that interpretation, the assessment order passed after receipt of the directions was held to be within time, and the limitation question was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 11 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28073</link>
      <description>For limitation under Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the relevant date for exclusion under Explanation 1(iv) is the date the Income-tax Officer receives the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s directions under Section 144B, not the date those directions are issued. Applying that interpretation, the assessment order passed after receipt of the directions was held to be within time, and the limitation question was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>