<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1412 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300710</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on previous court orders. The Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the absence of incriminating documents and relevance of decisions by other tribunals were considered, but the appeal was dismissed due to pending Special Leave Petitions and lack of substantial legal questions at the current stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1412 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300710</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on previous court orders. The Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the absence of incriminating documents and relevance of decisions by other tribunals were considered, but the appeal was dismissed due to pending Special Leave Petitions and lack of substantial legal questions at the current stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>