<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 825 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418574</link>
    <description>The AAR UP held that a promotional scheme offering 30 extra cigarette packs with every 100 packs purchased constitutes a taxable supply of 130 packs at the price of 100 packs. The additional 30 packs carry no separate tax liability, and input tax credit remains available for inputs used in the promotional supply. The ruling emphasized that supplies between related or distinct persons are taxable under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017, regardless of consideration. The applicant must not supply through sole distributors (related persons), as any deviation would void the ruling ab-initio under Section 104 of CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 825 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418574</link>
      <description>The AAR UP held that a promotional scheme offering 30 extra cigarette packs with every 100 packs purchased constitutes a taxable supply of 130 packs at the price of 100 packs. The additional 30 packs carry no separate tax liability, and input tax credit remains available for inputs used in the promotional supply. The ruling emphasized that supplies between related or distinct persons are taxable under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017, regardless of consideration. The applicant must not supply through sole distributors (related persons), as any deviation would void the ruling ab-initio under Section 104 of CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>