<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 816 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418565</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to pass the penalty order u/s 271AAC while the case was pending before the ITSC, as per the exclusive jurisdiction granted to the ITSC. Therefore, the penalty order was quashed as infructuous, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 816 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418565</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to pass the penalty order u/s 271AAC while the case was pending before the ITSC, as per the exclusive jurisdiction granted to the ITSC. Therefore, the penalty order was quashed as infructuous, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>