<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 809 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, holding that no disallowance under section 36(1)(va) was justified for delayed deposit of PF/ESIC dues for A.Y. 2018-19. Contributions were deposited before filing the return, and the Finance Act 2021 amendment was deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, following precedents favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 809 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, holding that no disallowance under section 36(1)(va) was justified for delayed deposit of PF/ESIC dues for A.Y. 2018-19. Contributions were deposited before filing the return, and the Finance Act 2021 amendment was deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, following precedents favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>