<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 807 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418556</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,33,01,950/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants, referencing judicial precedents to support its decision. The ITAT noted deficiencies in the AO&#039;s inquiries and lack of evidence to refute the assessee&#039;s claims, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 807 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418556</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,33,01,950/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants, referencing judicial precedents to support its decision. The ITAT noted deficiencies in the AO&#039;s inquiries and lack of evidence to refute the assessee&#039;s claims, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>