https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418543 The court upheld the suspension order dated June 07, 2021, issued under Section 13 of the FCRA, 2010, finding it justified based on the material available on record. The court clarified that no inquiry was necessary before suspension under Section 13(1) and emphasized that the suspension is an interim measure pending cancellation consideration. The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension order, noting that the reasons for suspension were valid and satisfied the doctrine of proportionality under the FCRA, 2010. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418543 The court upheld the suspension order dated June 07, 2021, issued under Section 13 of the FCRA, 2010, finding it justified based on the material available on record. The court clarified that no inquiry was necessary before suspension under Section 13(1) and emphasized that the suspension is an interim measure pending cancellation consideration. The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension order, noting that the reasons for suspension were valid and satisfied the doctrine of proportionality under the FCRA, 2010. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418543