https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418533 The court allowed the applicant to withdraw 30% of the cheque amount deposited by respondent no. 2, emphasizing compliance with the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the respondent's objection based on a prior withdrawal application, the court found the current application maintainable. Interpreting Section 148(1) of the Act, the court asserted its jurisdiction to permit withdrawal during the appeal process, with the obligation to repay if necessary. Ultimately, the court granted the applicant's request, considering her financial needs and the legal framework. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:02:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418533 The court allowed the applicant to withdraw 30% of the cheque amount deposited by respondent no. 2, emphasizing compliance with the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the respondent's objection based on a prior withdrawal application, the court found the current application maintainable. Interpreting Section 148(1) of the Act, the court asserted its jurisdiction to permit withdrawal during the appeal process, with the obligation to repay if necessary. Ultimately, the court granted the applicant's request, considering her financial needs and the legal framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418533