<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1091 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300673</link>
    <description>Prior Division Bench decisions of the same HC had already covered the identical controversy against the Revenue, so no substantial question of law survived for consideration in the appeal. The Court therefore treated the issue as concluded by binding precedent and did not entertain the appeal on merits, which stood dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1091 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300673</link>
      <description>Prior Division Bench decisions of the same HC had already covered the identical controversy against the Revenue, so no substantial question of law survived for consideration in the appeal. The Court therefore treated the issue as concluded by binding precedent and did not entertain the appeal on merits, which stood dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>