https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300672 An intra-court appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 was held not maintainable against a single Judge's Article 226 order directing implementation of an industrial award. The court treated proceedings for enforcement of the award under Section 14A read with Section 16 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as orders made "in respect of" the award, since that phrase was construed broadly to include matters connected with its implementation. Because the rule excludes appeals from such Article 226 orders and the right of appeal is purely statutory, no appeal lay in the absence of express permission. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:43:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300672 An intra-court appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 was held not maintainable against a single Judge's Article 226 order directing implementation of an industrial award. The court treated proceedings for enforcement of the award under Section 14A read with Section 16 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as orders made "in respect of" the award, since that phrase was construed broadly to include matters connected with its implementation. Because the rule excludes appeals from such Article 226 orders and the right of appeal is purely statutory, no appeal lay in the absence of express permission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300672